Sourcing · Pledge

Credit where the
evidence came from.

SOURCING PLEDGE · Version 1 · 29 October 2026.
A standing commitment by SPEAC Social Inc., written in plain language so every line can be checked against the code as it runs and against the ledger below. It has not yet been reviewed by legal counsel; it will be before SPEAC opens beyond the beta. It is dated and versioned like SPEAC's privacy notice and terms.

The pledge

Every SPEAC finding rests on sources. Many of them are the work of journalists and researchers whose reporting settled the question. SPEAC pledges two things to them.

Credit now. Since 29 October 2026, the source line under a finding names the outlet and, where the page carries one, the journalist, instead of a bare domain. The credit is read from the page's own metadata. Nothing is asked of the publisher.

A share when SPEAC earns. Five percent of SPEAC's net revenue is set aside each year and paid to the publishers of original reporting and research, in proportion to how often their work was cited in SPEAC findings that year. Every eligible publisher is owed its share from the moment it is cited, whether or not it has ever spoken to SPEAC. Signing up only tells SPEAC where to send the money.

How the share is worked out

What can never be bought

Citations are chosen by SPEAC's editorial rules alone, from what the evidence supports. No agreement, payment, partnership or licence can earn a source preference, and the same rules apply to every source, partner or not. A publisher that gives SPEAC access to its archive gets better evidence read, not a thumb on the scale. This wall is the reason the pledge can exist: a share paid for citations is only honest if the citations cannot be influenced by the share.

A finding may still be wrong, and a cited publisher may disagree with it. Any publisher cited in a finding can ask for a correction or an update by email, and SPEAC will answer.

How to claim a share

Email ntrepanier@speacsocial.com from a publisher address with the name of the publication and where payment should go. That is the whole process. There is no form, no contract and no exclusivity. You can also ask, at any time, how often your work has been cited.

The ledger, 2026 to date

SPEAC has no revenue yet, so the 2026 pool is zero. The ledger is published anyway so the shares are visible before any money exists. Since the beta opened in July, SPEAC findings have cited 604 sources across 253 checked posts: 201 are governments and other bodies reporting their own facts, credited and not paid; 11 came through syndication hosts and platforms and are not yet attributed to their originators, so they are left out; 392 are eligible, from 218 publishers.

See the full ledger → Every publisher is listed alphabetically with its count and share. It is a record of where the evidence was found for the claims people happened to post, not a ranking of outlets, and a publisher that does not appear was simply not cited.

The count runs from the beta's first checks in July, before several of SPEAC's sourcing rules existed, and would look different if those checks were run today; no money is attached to 2026, so the early period advantages no one. Repositories such as arXiv host research they did not produce; a share credited to a repository belongs to the authors' institutions, as with syndication. The counts are taken automatically from the findings as published. The sorting into eligible and credited-only is done by rules, with judgment on the edge cases, and corrected when wrong; tell us if yours is.

Changes

This pledge is dated and versioned. A later version will be posted here with its date and a line saying what changed, and earlier versions will stay reachable. The percentage, the minimum payout and the holding period can go up; they will not go down for a year already ledgered.

30 October 2026. Wording clarified, no change to the terms: the pool is net of sales taxes; syndicated citations are not yet attributed to their originators and are excluded from the count; notes added on research repositories and on the early beta period. Later the same day, the table of the largest shares was replaced by a full alphabetical ledger on its own page, so the record cannot be read as a ranking, and a review of the sorting moved 34 entries from the eligible list to the credited-only and not-yet-attributed lists.

Beta privacy notice →Beta terms of use →Version française →